Thank you for shining a light on this madness, Blake.
Also, this is the first time I’ve heard of the Michael Spangler you referenced. There’s no relation but it’s sad to see him tarnish the name. I’m keeping my R.
I’ve made a promise to myself if a Christian nationalist, a bad one, ever runs for office, I will run against them, no questions act, and I say that as a Christian.
I'm fairly certain that some people take some of what Doug Wilson says too seriously. The guy does have a sense of humor, and I'm certain that he isn't against different-race marriage.
Also, it's possible to see both sides of a very ridiculous debate.
Oh, don't retcon what you did, "Pastor" Jed. Own it. If you haven't noticed, my public writing is generally dedicated to a particular topic. Do you agree with his statement that ethnic intermarriage would render us a 'light brown homogeneous goo scramble"? I mean, that's what you took time out of your day to implicitly defend.
I'm amazed that you're still coming with that line, Bennet, as if anyone could believe that "light brown homogenous goo scramble" was referring to anything other than what he thinks humanity would look like if all ethnic groups intermixed.
As for your claim Wilson is clear in disagreement with Wolfe regarding ethno-nationalism (which I've more than shown is littered throughout the book that Wolfe himself says promotes "blood and soil"), it apparently hasn't given Wilson any reason to take action. As I wrote, Canon is even planning an abridged version, to rake in more money off of a guy who, among many other things, promoted the Darwinian eugenic pseudoscience of physiognomy a couple months back. Again, I'm amazed you're coming with that excuse.
Thank you for proving the point of the post, that there are a cadre of people who don't pick up on the shtick and keep defending Wilson, no matter what he does.
Again, thank you for proving the point of the post. I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone stretch so much to try to explain away something that is, on its face, utterly reprehensible. It’s already reprehensible by “light brown.” It’s ridiculously reprehensible by “homogenous goo scramble.”
Thank you for shining a light on this madness, Blake.
Also, this is the first time I’ve heard of the Michael Spangler you referenced. There’s no relation but it’s sad to see him tarnish the name. I’m keeping my R.
I’ve made a promise to myself if a Christian nationalist, a bad one, ever runs for office, I will run against them, no questions act, and I say that as a Christian.
I'm fairly certain that some people take some of what Doug Wilson says too seriously. The guy does have a sense of humor, and I'm certain that he isn't against different-race marriage.
Also, it's possible to see both sides of a very ridiculous debate.
Doug Wilson meant what he said. Look at who he has promoted and partnered with.
Man it's gotten hard to keep track of post-post-modern political movements.
The pastor of Grace Church in Elk Grove, California, showing what he thinks of 1 Timothy 3. Why don't you try addressing the content of the post, Jed?
Your obligations to your office, and its requirement that you rid yourself of childish insults, have nothing to do with me.
Oh, don't retcon what you did, "Pastor" Jed. Own it. If you haven't noticed, my public writing is generally dedicated to a particular topic. Do you agree with his statement that ethnic intermarriage would render us a 'light brown homogeneous goo scramble"? I mean, that's what you took time out of your day to implicitly defend.
I'm amazed that you're still coming with that line, Bennet, as if anyone could believe that "light brown homogenous goo scramble" was referring to anything other than what he thinks humanity would look like if all ethnic groups intermixed.
As for your claim Wilson is clear in disagreement with Wolfe regarding ethno-nationalism (which I've more than shown is littered throughout the book that Wolfe himself says promotes "blood and soil"), it apparently hasn't given Wilson any reason to take action. As I wrote, Canon is even planning an abridged version, to rake in more money off of a guy who, among many other things, promoted the Darwinian eugenic pseudoscience of physiognomy a couple months back. Again, I'm amazed you're coming with that excuse.
Thank you for proving the point of the post, that there are a cadre of people who don't pick up on the shtick and keep defending Wilson, no matter what he does.
Please explain to me how “globalization” turns humanity into “a light brown homogeneous goo scramble.”
I need all the details. Explain it to me like I’m five.
Again, thank you for proving the point of the post. I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone stretch so much to try to explain away something that is, on its face, utterly reprehensible. It’s already reprehensible by “light brown.” It’s ridiculously reprehensible by “homogenous goo scramble.”
“But he said this elsewhere…”
Please reread the first sentence of the post.